YouTube to Demonetise AI-Generated Content from July 15, Marking a New Era in Platform Authenticity

SRINAGAR: A seismic shift is underway in the world of digital content creation as YouTube prepares to enforce sweeping changes to its monetisation policy. Beginning July 15, 2025, the platform will stop allowing creators to earn revenue from videos that are largely or entirely generated by artificial intelligence. The decision, aimed at curbing the spread of what is increasingly being termed “AI slop,” represents YouTube’s most aggressive push yet to preserve authenticity, creativity and viewer trust in an ecosystem long challenged by automation.

The announcement, though framed by YouTube as a “minor” update to its longstanding Partner Programme guidelines, marks a profound redefinition of what counts as monetisable content. For years, YouTube has required creators to produce “original” and “authentic” material. But with the rise of generative AI tools capable of churning out synthetic news segments, deepfake interviews, animated avatars and lifeless voiceovers, the company is now drawing a hard line. Videos where primary visuals or audio are produced by artificial intelligence without meaningful human involvement will no longer be eligible for monetisation.

This includes content featuring AI-generated voices, music tracks or animations, as well as fabricated news reports, fictionalised characters and videos that mimic real people or events through machine learning. The message from YouTube is unequivocal: human creativity must be at the heart of content that earns revenue.

The context for this shift is a platform under siege from its own technological potential. As AI tools became more sophisticated and widely available, entire genres of video emerged that barely involved human touch. Some channels uploaded thousands of faceless, templated videos made by scripting software and text-to-speech tools. These often used rehashed visuals or repurposed news clips aim solely to generate ad impressions. Even more concerning were examples where creators used AI to convincingly mimic public figures or to create fictional crime stories passed off as real.

Earlier this year, one such true crime series went viral before it was revealed to be entirely AI-fabricated. In another incident, scammers used a deepfake of YouTube CEO Neal Mohan to trick viewers. Despite having systems in place to report such misuse, the volume and velocity of this synthetic content had grown to the point where more decisive intervention became inevitable.

What the platform is now trying to dismantle is not only a technical problem but a cultural one. A growing share of creators had begun to treat content as a numbers game, optimised for clicks and watch time rather than storytelling or insight. Entire online forums and YouTube tutorials sprang up to teach people how to “monetise without showing your face,” often through AI-powered shortcuts. Many of these videos looked alike, sounded alike, and conveyed little more than repetition disguised as relevance.

YouTube, which remains the world’s largest video-sharing platform, is now determined to clean house. In updated help documentation, the company explained that it is revising its monetisation rules to better reflect what inauthentic content looks like today. While the new policy does not ban the use of AI altogether, it makes clear that content must carry significant human input to be monetised through commentary, storytelling, analysis or artistic expression.

Creators who rely on automated voices, generic visuals, and mass-uploaded templates are likely to find themselves demonetised. Even channels that reuse third-party clips or apply superficial edits like cropping or colour changes will be scrutinised for failing to transform the material meaningfully. What YouTube now demands is not just novelty, but distinctiveness—videos that could not exist without the human behind them.

This shift is already creating ripples among creators. Some worry that even popular formats like reaction videos or remix content could come under threat. However, YouTube’s Head of Editorial and Creator Liaison, Rene Ritchie, has tried to reassure the community. In a recent video, he described the change as a clarification rather than a crackdown, and emphasised that content offering commentary, education or transformation will still be eligible for monetisation. The intent, he said, is not to limit creativity, but to ensure that revenue is awarded to creators who add real value.

While some may still see this as a modest update, the implications are far-reaching. For many channels that thrived on automation, this could mean the end of easy profits. According to Statista, YouTube removed over 9.5 million videos in the last quarter of 2024 alone, many flagged as repetitive or inauthentic. The new policy is designed to reduce the incentive to produce such material in the first place.

From an advertiser’s standpoint, the change is likely to be welcome. Brands have long been wary of their ads appearing alongside questionable or low-effort content. By tightening the rules, YouTube is also bolstering its commercial credibility, positioning itself as a space where meaningful, high-quality content, not algorithmic filler, commands attention and earns revenue.

For genuine creators, the policy could prove to be an unexpected windfall. With less competition from mass-produced videos, those who invest time, thought and personality into their work may see greater visibility and monetisation opportunities. YouTube’s manual review process, already a part of its Partner Program onboarding, will become more rigorous after July 15. New channels applying for monetisation will need to meet not just numeric thresholds of watch hours and subscribers, but also demonstrate originality and authenticity in their libraries. Channels already enrolled in the program could be audited and, if found in violation, removed or suspended.

Ultimately, this move reasserts YouTube’s vision of itself not just as a repository of videos but as a platform for human expression. In an age of abundant automation, the platform is betting on people—not programs—to lead its next chapter. What unfolds after July 15 could reshape the creator economy in ways not yet fully understood. But one thing is clear: the age of the copy-paste channel is drawing to a close, and the future of monetised video lies with those willing to bring their own voice to the screen.