
Amid mounting debate over its approved definition of the Aravalli hills, the Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the issue and will hear the matter on Monday. A three-judge vacation bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices JK Maheshwari and Augustine George Masih is set to take up the case titled “In Re: Definition of Aravalli Hills and Ranges and Ancillary Issues.”
The hearing follows the apex court’s November 20 judgment, which adopted a uniform definition for the Aravalli hills and ranges across Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan, and Gujarat. The court had also imposed a ban on new mining leases in these areas pending expert reports.
The court accepted recommendations from a Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) committee, which defined an Aravalli hill as any landform in designated districts with an elevation of at least 100 metres above local relief. A range would comprise two or more such hills located within 500 metres of each other.
The judgement, part of the long-running TN Godavarman Thirumulpad environmental litigation, underscored the ecological significance of the Aravallis — calling them a “green barrier” against the Thar desert’s eastward expansion and a vital biodiversity hotspot.
Chief Justice Gavai, who authored the 29-page order, noted: “We further accept the recommendations with regard to the prohibition of mining in core/inviolate areas with exception as carved out of the … committee’s report.”
The court directed authorities to map out zones for mining and conservation, stressing that no new leases be granted until a Management Plan for Sustainable Mining (MPSM), to be finalised by MoEF&CC and ICFRE, is in place. Existing mining operations may continue but must comply with the committee’s guidelines.
(With inputs from PTI)






